Why did Reconstruction fail? Who was president and why was he a failure in regards to Reconstruction? Should the Southern leadership have been punished? You can refer to the Disenfranchisement section of your lessons in week two.
Discuss how the intellectual movements of the late 19th and early 20th centuries undermined many of the traditional values of Western society. Base your discussion on the themes and concepts from the readings and lectures.
500 words or more.
Topic:- Explain how African American communities in America responded to and resisted their condition
The final paper is 11 page research paper that must be written in APA Format. There are no extensions for this assignment. Library The libraries, located in Building B downtown and at West Campus, provide access to both traditional paper resources and electronic resources such as databases. The library web page is structured as a control panel at www.dallascollege.edu/Library where you can find key links and quickly navigate to what you need. The librarians welcome your questions in person, over the phone, or online. Online help is available through Ask a Librarian.
Select a MOVIE that is highly related to the themes, characters, or events of “CRITICAL MASS CULTURE”. Watch the movie and write a detailed review that explains its relevance to at least three themes/topics.
1. Here are the topics: THE GREAT DEPRESSION, THE HARLEM RENAISSANCE, and PROTESTS & THE PURSUIT OF DEMOCRACY..
2. Please view the movie review example
3. No specific word count
In this lecture, I explained some of the reasons why Christianity spread successfully in the Roman Empire in the first few centuries CE. Which reason do you think played the biggest role in helping to spread the new religion to Roman citizens between the 1st and 4th centuries CE (0 – 399 CE)?
Directions for Answering the Question:
Using information from the lecture,
Identify and fully describe 4 reasons that the new religion of Christianity spread so successfully in the Roman Empire
Make sure you talk about Christianity as a new religion established after Jesus’s crucifixion. Do not discuss the conflict between the different Jewish groups or what Jesus said.
Make sure to stay focused on the information in the lecture. That’s what I’m grading you on. Although you’re welcome to discuss it, I don’t give credit for why you personally think Christianity is great or not.
Identify which reason you believe was most important for the spread of Christianity in the Roman Empire between the 1st and 4th centuries CE (0 – 399 CE).
Fully explain why the reason you chose was most important. Support your answer by bringing in specific information and examples from the lecture.
Important Rules for all Lecture Questions:
Only use information from the lecture to answer the question. These questions are intended to check that you watched and understood the lecture. If you use information from an outside source/s, your assignment will receive a zero.
Fully explain your statements and include specific examples from the lecture.
Explain all information in your own words. Do not quote or copy and paste from the lecture or my powerpoint. Doing so will earn your assignment a zero.
Use good grammar, including complete sentences and correct punctuation. You may use bullet points, but the information you write out beside those bullet points should be complete sentences, not single words or sentence fragments.
Environment in History: How did environmental factors play a significant role in this week’s period of study? Select and explain two different environmental aspects from the assigned videos and readings. Which was more important?
Purpose in Life: Select one or two passages from Gilgamesh that present Mesopotamian perspectives on how best to live. Contrast this vision with that of the Tale of the Eloquent Peasant.
The Project of Empire: In your analysis of this week’s content, which factor has priority in securing imperial power: trade, nomads, technology? Discuss two of the three. Make your case by drawing on the course content.
All students are required to respond to THREE other student posts each week The goal here is to ENGAGE in respectful dialogue – be supportive of each other, even as you are critical of each other’s ideas.
Sam: Some revelations I had this week include the following:
The first revelation I had was the remembrance of a book I read not too long ago. Which I unfortunately cannot remember the name of at the moment. But in the book, they talked about a woman’s journey from her home to a Nazi camp. On the train to the campsite another woman confessed to everyone on the cart that she was smuggling a baby with her because she couldn’t let go of her son, it was too difficult to do. All the women discussed and said they would keep it a secret except for one. So as the train slowed, and the men went searching through each cart to make sure nobody had anything they weren’t supposed to. The woman who said she was going to snitch, did so. The guards went to the mother and took her baby from her. Then without a blink of an eye the guard snapped the babies back over his knee and broke it like a twig, then throwing it to the ground and instructing everyone to get back into the train. This was the most disgusting thing when I read it for the first time. I cannot imagine any human being treating a baby in that manner.
The next revelation I had was that the Nazis did not invent concentration camps. Places like Cuba, the Philippines, and even the United States all held people in camps who were considered enemies. The only difference in these camps were the Nazis invention of gas chambers and using them to kill the people in said sites.
Lastly, something I realized was that the Nazis thought that the Jewish people were a whole separate race of people than them, where in fact they are only a different religion. So, it is so shocking that they grouped them together as a race when they could be from all different parts of the world.
One open ended question I can pose to the class this week is, how could somebody instruct others to kill perfectly innocent human beings?
1. In order to survive the Holocaust, one needed to be capable of a lot, from giving up on family members and being strong. It is written, “Whenever he found someone extremely frail…. he would write down his number: good for the crematorium,” signifying that the odds of death were higher for those who were too weak and could not at least run (Wiesel, 70). Eliezar tries not to act like the son of the rabbi who gives up on his own dad, but eventually must because his dad has become too much of a burden and one of the prisoners told him, “Listen to me, kid. Don’t forget that you are in a concentration camp. In this place, it is every man for himself, and you cannot think of others. Not even your father. In this place, there is no such thing as father, brother, friend. Each of us lives and dies alone,” (Wiesel, 110).
2. Night reveals that there is a persistence among the Nazis to keep persecuting the Jews even when the war is about to end. They took the time to transport over a hundred Jews from one camp to another, though it must have been frankly obvious many of them would die with the state they were in and they did, “We had been a hundred or so in this wagon. Twelve of us left it. Among them, my father and myself. We had arrived in Buchenwald,” (Wiesel, 103).
3. The horrors of the Holocaust seem to even Eliezer and other Jews to have been kept hidden for a long time. When Moishe comes back from his capture, “He spoke only of what he had seen. But people not only refused to believe his tales, they refused to listen,” (Wiesel, 7). Another prisoner later remarks, “You should have hanged yourselves rather than come here. Didn’t you know what was in store for you here in Auschwitz? You didn’t know? In 1944?” (Wiesel, 30). There is ignorance even up to 1944 that people, even fellow Jews, did not know of the full degree of persecution going on during the Holocaust till the end of the war.
Question: I am still left wondering to what varying degree did the Allies know about the Holocaust before entering Germany?
1) Weisel wrote, “I thanked God, in an improvised prayer, for having created mud in His infinite and wondrous universe” (page 38). This quotation from the text revealed the gratefulness people can have for the most mundane things. Here, for example, Wesiel was thankful for mud to shield his new shoes from being taken.
Later, Weisel wrote, “And in spite of myself, a prayer formed inside me, a prayer to this God in whom I no longer believed” (page 91). Throughout the book, I felt that Wesiel was very conflicted with his relationship with God. It didn’t make sense to him that God would let all of these terrible things happen. This also tied into his first stray from God on page 69, when he denied the fast, and rebelled against Him.
Within the last few pages of the book, Weisel narrates, “If only I didn’t find him! If only I were relieved of this responsibility, I could use all my strength to fight for my own survival, to take care of only myself” (page 106). This quote exposes the necessary selfishness that Weisel was facing. He could see that his fathers life was coming to an end, and could see how much easier it would be without him. The sentences following also reveal his shame for thinking such things.
2) The author could have chosen to describe himself as a more heroic figure in his book, but rather decided to reveal even his most shameful thoughts, why do you think that is?
-History does not repeat itself, but it often rhymes.
-History is a set of lies, agreed upon.
-History is the sum total of things that could have been avoided.
-History is a gallery of pictures in which there are few originals and many copies.
History repeats itself, first as a tragedy, then as a farce.
1. Choose three of the five descriptions of history and discuss them from your own perspective and how you feel about the study of the past through the eyes of people. Tie them together logically and discuss how you got to this point. How do you relate these things? Do you agree or disagree as a whole?
2. How would YOU describe history in the most succinct way possible. Use your own words, not text from online or outside sources. I am looking for your own point of view, creativity and insight into how you view things.
INITIAL POST should contain 300 words, substantive and addresses the prompt. Each of the the required secondary posts and commentary should EACH be at least 150 words of relevant and substantial responses
Using information from the lecture,
Describe an approach that the Neo-Assyrians used to force conquered people to become part of their empire
Make sure to fully describe this approach; don’t simply list/identify it.
Describe an approach the Chaldeans used to force conquered people to become part of their empire
Make sure to fully describe this approach; don’t simply say that it was the same as the Neo-Assyrians.
Describe an approach the Persians used to conquer other people and establish a successful empire
Make sure to fully describe this approach; don’t simply say they were nice.
Identify which empire you believe took the most effective approach to conquering people and establishing a successful empire.
You must choose one empire (none is not an option), but only choose one.
Using specific information and examplesfrom the lecture, fully explain why you think your chosen empire took the most effective approach.
Keep in mind that “effective” does not have to mean the “nicest” approach.
I recently came across a cool article ( see here – https://www.curezone.org/blogs/fm.asp?i=2448206 ) , here I have no doubts about the relevance of the data. But in general, I am looking for specialists who can check the data as soon as possible.